Google Website Translator Gadget

English plantillas curriculums vitae French cartas de amistad German documental Spain cartas de presentación Italian xo Dutch películas un link Russian templates google Portuguese foro de coches Japanese catálogos de Korean entrevistas a Arabic Chinese Simplified

Buscar este blog

Traductor

martes, 16 de octubre de 2012

More doctors honor religious objections to blood transfusions

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-jehovahs-witness-patients-bloodless-treatme-20121009,0,7706590.story

 

video http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-121002-jehovahs-witness-bloodless-treatment-video,0,1493866.premiumvideo

 

 

 

October 9, 2012

As a Jehovah's Witness, Tracy Pickett always has enjoyed knocking on doors and introducing strangers to the tenets of her faith. But by the time she reached her mid-40s, scoliosis made every step excruciating and her spiritual mission impossible.

 

Walking again would require surgery that often involves tremendous blood loss and a transfusion — a medical procedure to replenish the blood supply forbidden by her church.

 

"Even though I love life and I don't want to die, I want good medical care without blood," said Pickett, 49, of Crown Point, Ind. "If it got to that point, I would rather lose my life than disobey my creator and take a blood transfusion."

 

Dr. Christopher Dewald, Pickett's orthopedic surgeon at Rush University Medical Center, nervously agreed to find alternatives and perform the surgery. Dewald said he couldn't fathom letting a patient die on his operating table, but because he respected Pickett's convictions, he invested time to explore the options.

 

"I explained to her that I would have a hard time letting her pass away right in front of me and that I might have a problem not giving her blood," said Dewald, a Roman Catholic. "But I was going to do everything in my power to honor her wishes."

 

For years, many doctors have resisted accommodating religious tenets that they believe endanger their patients. But more physicians, including Dewald, are practicing within the confines of religious restrictions, even when it might put their patients' lives at risk.

 

Although alternatives to transfusions have been around for years, more physicians are weighing patients' spiritual well-being and peace of mind as part of their treatment.

 

"In the rational realm, it doesn't necessarily make sense," said Dr. Valluvan Jeevanandam, an expert in high-risk cardiac surgery at the University of Chicago Medical Center. "But if what they believe makes them peaceful and content, I'm not going to take that away from them."

 

Jehovah's Witnesses cite Acts 15 in their own New World translation of the Holy Scriptures to explain their objection to blood transfusions. "Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God, but should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from blood."

 

Most Christians believe that verse denounces pagan rituals such as eating and drinking blood. But Jehovah's Witnesses interpret it as a prohibition on accepting blood that has been removed and stored. They also point to four verses in Leviticus and three verses in Deuteronomy to demonstrate that any blood spilled and not eaten (referring to animal blood) should not be reused, but given back to God.

 

Because it can be difficult to find doctors who respect the rule, the church appoints hospital liaisons to manage a database of local physicians and make referrals.

 

"Each major city of the world has a hospital liaison committee to bridge the gap between the Jehovah's Witness community and medical community," said T.J. Bullock, the church's liaison in Chicago. "If physicians have questions about what we accept or don't accept or are looking for advice, we can put them in touch with other physicians."

 

Jeevanandam has accepted many of Bullock's referrals. He said he warns every patient that the mortality rate is higher for anyone who declines blood transfusions.

 

"We don't have a 100 percent success rate. We do lose people," he said. "You're telling me what ammunition to use to fix your problem. If you take blood away, that's a large portion of my arsenal. There will be potential for higher complications."

 

Brian Montalbano, 31, of Nashville, Tenn., found Jeevanandam several years ago when he needed a second heart transplant. His first transplant at age 9, before he was a Jehovah's Witness, had involved a transfusion that also transmitted a virus, he said.

 

By the time he came to Jeevanandam in his late 20s, he not only remembered that rocky recovery, but also had converted to a faith that didn't allow another transfusion. However, it did allow him to get a new heart.

 

Montalbano encountered more complications. Shortly after the surgery, his lungs filled with fluid. Other doctors besides Jeevanandam recommended a transfusion to boost his strength. Still, he declined, resulting in a stroke that temporarily paralyzed his left side, he said.

 

"I believe I was making the right decision," said Montalbano, adding that he has fully recovered. "The ultimate goal is to serve God and do his will. And I believed that if I made it through, I would be doing it faithfully. Any risks that come would be worth the reward."

 

Dr. Hieu Ton-That, a trauma surgeon at Loyola University Medical Center, has struggled to build a critical mass of specialized colleagues who agree to avoid transfusions regardless of the outcome. He has worked to overcome the widespread misperception that Jehovah's Witnesses wholly reject medical care.

 

 

 

No hay comentarios.:

Publicar un comentario

.